Politics and Religion Essay

To practise the theoretical question whether or non, if I was a semi governmental leader in the early seventeenth century, I would affair theology to my cause ends would be really difficult and daunting. At the very step to the foreset, it should be famed that the 17th century was a very evoke period. It was characterized by major movements, shakers, upheavals and pivotal depicts. To be abbreviated and concise, allow me to offer a fourth dimensionless, albeit simplistic answer to this above mentioned hypothetical question. My answer would be NO, and I offer three reasons to back my answer.1. Politics and worship must(prenominal) never mix. Most democratic countries apply in their state principles and policy that in that respect should be a separation of Church and State. So often so, matters of spiritual import can not and must not exist alongside matters of political and materialistic dominions. To mix both would be to invite funny farm and perhaps, bigotry, soc ial injustice and create inequities due to all over zealous religiosity. 2. Lessons in History tell us that religious standards imposed by those who wield political influence crumbled in time.Such lessons definitely point out that indeed, sound judgment dictate that a political leader should not use holiness to advance his own ends. We see abdications, uprising and some other violent overthrows and civil uprising involving religious uncomfortableness and bigotry towards political leaders, not only in the 17th century, save all throughout history, when religion is used by political hands. Religion, being the opium of the good deal may prove beneficial at times, but in the long run, like the effect of drugs or opium, people come to their senses, and again, as earlier pointed out, there must be a separation of matters of religion and matters of state.3. Using religion to advance ones ends, no matter how noble is morally wrong. genius should use sheer power of conviction, politi cal go forth and strength of character and unbridled and sterling leading qualities if one is to be an effective political leader. The use of spirituality or religion in advancing ones political ends is a moral wrong. This by example, as the Spaniards once were, is called mammon after the Nazarene/Cross. Up until now, the Roman Catholic Church is plagued and chafe by the wrongs committed by the Church officials during the isolated ages.This only shows that again, Religion and Politics are deuce incompatible concepts, and should be avoided. While an enlightened system or political leadership is a paradox, it should not be an impossibility. After all, conscientious leadership is a desired trait for a political leader, however, out and out, politics and religion should not be stick out in one outfit, especially so in such turbulent a time as the 17th century. For the above stated reasons, I reiterate my answer No. If I was a political leader in the 17th century, I will not use religion for my own end.