Bad Decision-Making in Hamlet Essay -- Shakespeare plays, story analysi

Are you too quick to make great lasts? Do you act before you think? These quick decisions are ballpark in the snap settlement. Hamlet was written by William Shakespeare in 1589. The play takes place in Denmark. The protagonist is a prince named Hamlet. Hamlets novice suddenly dies, and Hamlets mother, Queen Gertrude, decides to marry Hamlets uncle, King Claudius. Hamlet slowly goes insane, and he wants revenge on the receiver of his father. Laertes, the son of the kings associate, makes a bad decision in the play. When Laertes father, Polonius, is killed, Laertes is outraged and seeks vengeance. Laertes made a bad decision in the play, alone he could ease up tried using the decision-making offset, weighing possible alternatives, and he could have changed the outcome of the play if he had made careful decisions. Laertes briny decision in Hamlet was how to seek revenge on Prince Hamlet for killing Polonius. There are seven steps to the decision-making pro cess. First, Laertes had to identify the decision that had to be made. Laertes did follow this step by looking for a solution of his fathers death. Next, Laertes should have gathered information relevant to his situation. kinda of this step, Laertes automatically assumed that he had to kill someone without knowing what rattling happened to Polonius. Then, Laertes should have identified his alternatives of the decision. Laertes did not explore alternative in the play. He immediately met with the king and decided to kill Prince Hamlet without looking at different ways to approach the situation. After exploring alternatives, Laertes should have weighed the evidence of the situation. The just evidence that Laertes had was the kings word that Hamlet... ...the king. By killing the king, they indue Denmark in better hands, and they save both of their lives. Also, Ophelia and Hamlet could get marry and take the throne. Just by changing Laertes decision, the ending of Haml et completely changes. Everyone is alive and healthy, except for King Claudius, and Denmark is not taken over by Fortinbras, an officer of a foreign country. By using the decision-making process, creating alternatives, and choosing the best outcome, Laertes would have completely changed the play, Hamlet. Laertes could have used steps two, three and four of the decision-making process to make an educated decision. Also, Laertes may have wanted to explore his umpteen alternatives and outcomes before making his decision. Lastly, Laertes should have talked to Hamlet about the death of Polonius. hold before you act, and do not be too quick to judge.